Showing posts with label Fred Karger. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fred Karger. Show all posts

Friday, June 22, 2012

Fred Karger vs Bryan Fischer Round 1 - WATCH

The two men battle it out here and Fred asked the ultimate question. Please watch

Thursday, June 7, 2012

In California: Fair Political Practices Commission will investigate NOM


Fred Karger is coming for NOM in a big way. He has asked the Fair Political Practices Commission to look into NOM's unreported contributions during the rise of Prop 8. The group has agreed to do the investigation.
Little-known GOP presidential candidate Fred Karger asked the commission to look into whether the National Organization for Marriage's "Yes on 8" campaign failed to report $350,400 it received nearly four years ago, including $10,000 from Romney's Alabama super PAC, "Free and Strong America."
Karger's complaint to the FPPC about $37,000 in non-monetary contributions made by the Mormon church to the gay-marriage ban campaign resulted in a $5,500 fine two years ago. 

Mormon officials agreed to pay the penalty, but denied the church hid the contributions. Instead, they said, the church had run afoul of daily reporting requirements.

"I'm two for two in California," Karger, who is the lone openly-gay GOP candidate, said in a telephone interview with The Bee's Torey Van Oot, referring to his FPPC complaint against the Mormon church.
A call and an email to the National Organization for Marriage wasn't immediately returned, but the group has said in the past that Karger has illegally put its private tax records in the public domain to press his complaints.

Karger said the documents in question are "absolutely" a part of the public domain and legal to be released.
NOM should be concerned and scared.

Read more here: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/06/watchdog-committee-investigating-whether-anti-gay-marriage-group-failed-to-report-contributions-gay-marriage-group.html#storylink=cpy


Read more here: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/06/watchdog-committee-investigating-whether-anti-gay-marriage-group-failed-to-report-contributions-gay-marriage-group.html#storylink=cpyKarger said the documents in question are "absolutely" a part of the public domain and legal to be released.

Read more here: http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2012/06/watchdog-committee-investigating-whether-anti-gay-marriage-group-failed-to-report-contributions-gay-marriage-group.html#storylink=cpy

Monday, January 3, 2011

NOM is LATE on Filing their Taxes Again, Fred Karger looks for Answers


NOM is really late with filing their taxes. In the past, they tried to keep it hidden from the public so we wouldn't find out that maybe the Mormons are supporting them.

Well, they are at it again and Fred Karger went looking for answers.
I recently visited their new National Office in Washington, DC twice during regular office hours to view the returns. No one was there. They must make them available to anyone during regular business hours. We also have checked online repeatedly for their 2009 returns, and again, nothing. What is NOM trying to hide? Why do they not file their tax returns every year?

Déjà Vu

I went through the identical exercise in 2009 when I attempted to view NOM’s 2007 and 2008 990’s, but they never filed those either. We visited their then National Office in Princeton, NJ many times and no one was ever there either.

One set of 990’s was 5 months late. The other set was 17 months late, when finally, the night before NOM President Brian Brown was to testify in front of the Maine Ethics Commission last year, all of their delinquent tax returns magically appeared on the NOM web site. 

It was too late to stave off a State of Maine investigation of NOM, because in spite of threatening to sue the State of Maine (which NOM eventually did), the Maine Ethics Commission voted to investigate the National Organization for Marriage for election “Money Laundering.”

NOM is not above the law. They need to file their Income Tax Returns like everyone else and every other organization. We are entitled to see just how much money they raised and spent in 2009. Whom are they trying to protect? 

That's the $64,000, who are they really protecting?

source